Difference between revisions of "Scholars Room How Balinese argue"
From BASAbaliWiki
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Authors=Biography of Mark Hobart | |Authors=Biography of Mark Hobart | ||
|Subject=Culture, Argument, monologue, dialogue, ideology | |Subject=Culture, Argument, monologue, dialogue, ideology | ||
− | |Abstract=The Imaginary of Bali as paradise stands in stark contrast to what is actually going on. To understand the split requires examining who is authorized to represent Bali as what under what conditions. The issue concerns the nature of argument – whether argumentation and disagreement – and how it disarticulates and marginalize alternatives. The preferred, hegemonic style of argument in Bali is monologue, favoured by those in power, which effectively anticipates and prevents contradiction. By contrast, dialogue is open, democratic and widespread in daily life, but often passes relatively unnoticed. Whereas dialogue enables discussion and problem-solving, monologue re-asserts ideology in the face of uncomfortable | + | |Abstract=The Imaginary of Bali as paradise stands in stark contrast to what is actually going on. To understand the split requires examining who is authorized to represent Bali as what under what conditions. The issue concerns the nature of argument – whether argumentation and disagreement – and how it disarticulates and marginalize alternatives. The preferred, hegemonic style of argument in Bali is monologue, favoured by those in power, which effectively anticipates and prevents contradiction. By contrast, dialogue is open, democratic and widespread in daily life, but often passes relatively unnoticed. Whereas dialogue enables discussion and problem-solving, monologue re-asserts ideology in the face of uncomfortable actualities. In Bali, the form ideology takes centres on fantasies about an imaginary ‘age-old culture’. The drawbacks are evident in how claims over the cultural antiquity of Tri Hita Karana disguise its grave shortcomings in practice. |
− | actualities. In Bali, the form ideology takes centres on fantasies about an imaginary ‘age-old culture’. The drawbacks are evident in how claims over the cultural antiquity of Tri Hita | ||
− | Karana disguise its grave shortcomings in practice. | ||
|Abstract ban=Sapunapi penampen manusa Bali? | |Abstract ban=Sapunapi penampen manusa Bali? | ||
Panyumpene ngeninin Bali sane kasengguh swarga ring sekala gumanti nungkalik ring kajusatiannyane. Antuk punika kapisaratang rarembayan ngeninin sape sira sane wenang ngangganin Bali, sekadi punapi lan rikapan. | Panyumpene ngeninin Bali sane kasengguh swarga ring sekala gumanti nungkalik ring kajusatiannyane. Antuk punika kapisaratang rarembayan ngeninin sape sira sane wenang ngangganin Bali, sekadi punapi lan rikapan. |
Latest revision as of 00:03, 4 November 2021
- Title of article (Indonesian)
- Bagaimana warga Bali berargumen
- Title of article (Balinese)
- Sapunapi penampen manusa Bali
- Original title language
- English
- Title (other local language)
- Author(s)
- Subjects
- Culture
- Argument
- monologue
- dialogue
- ideology
- Title of Journal
- Jurnal Kajian Bali (Journal of Bali Studies)
- Volume and Issue number
- Vol. 09/01
- Date of Publication
- Page Numbers
- 1-34
- Link to whole article
- https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kajianbali/article/view/48810/29081
- Related Places
- Related Holidays
- Related Books
- Related Lontar
Enable comment auto-refresher